Generally, however, people are aware that greenhouse gases emitted through air travel are harmful to the environment. Thoughts around air travel and carbon offsetting (balancing your carbon footprint by putting money into environmental projects elsewhere) popped up repeatedly in the responses to our survey, with one person suggesting that “all tour operators/airlines must build in carbon pricing”, rather than leaving it to individuals.
There are many organisations now catering for carbon guilt with offsetting projects, such as the widely recognised Gold Standard.
Another respondent requested “information on the most sustainable airlines”. The existence of sites such as Glooby and the Atmosfair Airline Index, which compare the CO2 emissions of different airlines, suggest this is an important factor for many people intending to fly.
31 percent plan to take fewer flights
Just as hygge entered our lexicon and we imported Scandi ideas of cosiness (no doubt Ikea did a roaring trade in candles and sheepskin throws), the Swedes then gave us flygskam. Referring to the shame of flying, you may hear it mentioned in the same sentence as tagskyrt, meaning pride in travelling by train (or train bragging).
You might also have heard of flygfritt (flight-free), a movement which rejects air travel, gathering pace in Sweden even before the pandemic grounded flights. This inspired the UK version, Flight Free UK.
This growing interest in replacing flying with greener modes of transport is reflected in the results of our survey. 31 percent of respondents said they planned to take fewer flights, with one person saying they intend to “discover travel treasures closer to home”. And over 57 percent said they planned to travel responsibly, even if it inconveniences them.